I think it simply gives them (law talkin' guys) one more thing to charge the
exploiters with.
Lack of documentation might be more proveable.
Like charging people with tax evasion because they don't have a tax stamp on a
bag of pot.
my USD0.02
will
>How does requiring more documentation of photo shoots prevent sexual
>exploits of children? Is the thinking that if you increase the amount
>of required documentation (which the exploiters are already not
>providing) that the exploiters will decide to stop or be easier to
>catch?
