Somewhat OT Making us look bad For the adobe engineers on the list

Oops... meant 8...yes...I am so used to saying CF9, it just comes naturally :-D.  Sorry for the confusion... > > ColdFusion 9.0.x not ColdFusion 8.0.x  What you are describing was true > for ColdFusion 8.0.x.  When ColdFusion 9.0.x was released ALL editions were > 64bit. > > Read this product Matrix > > http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion-family/buying-guide.html > >  All ColdFusion 9 editions can run as 64-bit applications on the 64-bit > versions of Microsoft Windows, Sun Solaris, Linux, and Mac OS. For detailed > information about supported platforms > > http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion-standard/faq.html > > Wil Genovese > Sr. Web Application Developer/ > Systems Administrator > CF Webtools > www.cfwebtools.com > > wilgeno@trunkful.com > www.trunkful.com > >  On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > > > > Not according to the website. It is compatable with 64 bit, but it is not > > 64 bit.  If you download a 64 bit version and enter in a standard > password, > > it will not accept it. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> ColdFusion 9/9.0.1 IS 64 bit for Standard AND Enterprise. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Wil Genovese > >> Sr. Web Application Developer/ > >> Systems Administrator > >> CF Webtools > >> www.cfwebtools.com > >> > >> wilgeno@trunkful.com > >> www.trunkful.com > >> > >> On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:54 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Standard doesn't have a 64 bit vesion...it is only Enterprise that > does. > >>> Standard is 32 bit only. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Wow. That's pretty tough. I didn't know that was required when > >>>> installing 64-bit version of CF. > >>>> > >>>> -KJ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Eric Roberts > >>>> <owner@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Why doesn't support seem to know to tell a customer, when they are > >>>>> installing CF9 standard on a 64 bit box that they need to go into the > >> IIS > >>>>> application pool setting and enable 32 bit apps?  I am doing a gig > for > >> a > >>>>> client that could get CF( installed and that was all it was).  That > >>>> should > >>>>> have been a quick fix.  While i glad for the business, I just think > >> this > >>>>> makes us as a community look bad when Adobe's support is that > >>>> incompetent. > >>>>> I have a stack of emails going back and forth about an inch thick and > >> not > >>>>> one mentioned.  My client got a CF app dumped in their lap and they > >>>> didn't > >>>>> have any CF resources.  Sorry for the rant, but since I know we have > >> some > >>>>> Adobe folks here...I thought this would be as good as a spot as any. > >>>> This > >>>>> is a HUGE company that could potentially get impressed by CF and > >> create a > >>>>> lot of CF jobs.  I won't name them, but i can tell you that probably > >>>>> everyone on this list has consumed their products...some on a regular > >>>>> basis.  This is how companies get turned off of products.  This could > >>>> have > >>>>> been a big win on Adobe's part.  Way to drop the ball.   Some days I > >> think > >>>>> Adobe purposely tries to sabotage their own product. Adobe > folks...feel > >>>>> free to pass this on to the appropriate people. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> back to your regularly scheduled topics... > >>>>> > >>>>> Eric > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >