|
Mailing Lists
|
Home /
Groups /
ColdFusion Talk (CF-Talk)
updating java / JDK with ColdFusion 9
Hi folks,Nick Gleason 07/22/12 07:52 P I routinely use 1.6.0_32 and 33 on the servers at Cfwebtools. No issues.Wil Genovese 07/22/12 08:52 P > A question about what is considered the appropriate version of Java for useDave Watts 07/23/12 12:07 A I'm using the latest release without any problems.Michael Dinowitz 07/23/12 01:13 A Many thanks for the responses! It sounds like upgrading should be prettyNick Gleason 07/23/12 02:01 P > Last question. If there is some sort of problem that emerges as a resultDave Watts 07/23/12 02:20 P Hi folks, A question about what is considered the appropriate version of Java for use with CF 9. As I understand it _24 is the last version officially suggested by Adobe. But that is susceptible to this exploit: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpujun2012-1515912.htm l So, have people had success with more recent versions? Or has Adobe suggested any more recent versions specifically? Thanks, Nick I routinely use 1.6.0_32 and 33 on the servers at Cfwebtools. No issues. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 22, 2012, at 6:51 PM, "Nick Gleason" <n.gleason@citysoft.com> wrote: ----- Excess quoted text cut - see Original Post for more ----- ----- Excess quoted text cut - see Original Post for more ----- Generally, you can use the latest point release for a supported major version. Adobe can't possibly test them all as they come out, so they're always behind. That said, a lot of the vulnerabilities listed in that document (maybe all - I didn't read it that thoroughly) are not things you generally have to worry about on a web server. Most of the items involve Java Web Start or running Java applets. Servlets/JSP and those sorts of things tend to have far fewer vulnerabilities. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. I'm using the latest release without any problems. On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Nick Gleason <n.gleason@citysoft.com>wrote: ----- Excess quoted text cut - see Original Post for more ----- Many thanks for the responses! It sounds like upgrading should be pretty smooth. Last question. If there is some sort of problem that emerges as a result of upgrading the JDK, how easy / hard would it be to re-install an earlier version? Can you go back or does that present additional complexity / problems? Nick ---------------------------------------- > Last question. If there is some sort of problem that emerges as a result > of upgrading the JDK, how easy / hard would it be to re-install an earlier > version? Can you go back or does that present additional complexity / > problems? Unless you were to overwrite or delete the old Java SDK, it should be trivial to change from one to the other. By default, when you install a new Java SDK, it will create a new directory and not interfere with whatever others you already have installed. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite.
|
May 18, 2013
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||