|
Mailing Lists
|
Home / Groups / CFUnit
Is This Project Still Active?I still try to focus on CFUnit, but I have not upgraded it in a while. It is still active and I do still try to support it as requests for help or support come in. However, I think changing the name to "ColdFusion Unit Testing" would be best. There are other frameworks out there, and I have seen what the MXUnit folks have done, and its a very nice product. -- Rob Blackburn > > So I should either change this list to ColdFusion Unit Testing or MXUnit. > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Sean Corfield <seancorfield@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> > Is CFUnit still actively maintained? There haven't been any releases or >> updates to the website in 2 years. >> >> CFUnit was a dead project before the current owner resurrected it. >> cfcUnit has died off (Paul's not doing CFML these days). MXUnit is >> very actively developed (and has a mode to run CFUnit tests pretty >> much unchanged, I believe). >> >> > * Adding an argument to the TestSuite class to specify a single test >> method to run. This is useful when you're developing a test, or curious >> about a single test, and don't want to run the entire suite. >> > * Modified TestRunner.cfc to stream a list of tests as they're run. This >> is useful when running large suites, since CFUnit's default behavior is show >> no status at all. >> > * A template listing all test classes and functions, to allow user >> selection of specific suite/method to run. >> >> MXUnit provides most (all?) of that, I believe. They're also looking >> at adding annotations to allow you to run specific groups of tests, as >> well as dependent groups of tests (a la TestNG). The MXUnit team have >> big plans :) >> -- >> Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN >> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ >> >> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." >> -- Margaret Atwood >> >> > > |
February 12, 2012
|
Latest Fusion Authority Articles
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||