Framework comparisons

> Isaac, > Have you done any more work on the framework comparisons > for similar apps? I would think your blogging application > would be perfect for this. You could re-write it in > Model-Glue, Mach ii, and Fusebox. > I'm still a bit concerned with the overhead of onTap for > each request, and the generated content appearing on the > screen. I'm sure myself, and others, would really be > interested in a comparison. Myself and several other framework authors including Jeff Peters (Fusebox), Hal Helms/Ben Edwards (Mach-II), and Joe Rinehart (Model-Glue) are building versions of Macromedia's Pet Market sample application with articles for publication in an upcoming ColdFusion Developer's Journal. This was all Simon Horwith's idea, something he proposed to us while we were speaking at the frameworks conference last week. Once they're all built, of course there should be plenty of code to peruse and you can load it all up and examine it with your load-testing tool of choice. (I think "Open STA" was the name of the tool we used for load testing recently at my current job.) s. isaac dealey     954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm